use of a combination of a nitrate compound and a sulfate compound, compound feed and feed supplement

专利摘要:
USE OF A COMBINATION OF A NITRATE COMPOUND AND A SULFATE COMPOUND, COMPOUND FEED AND FEED SUPPLEMENT The present invention relates to the reduction of gastrointestinal methanogenesis in ruminants with the aid of agents that compete for the hydrogen atoms required by methanogens during normal fermentation. of the food eaten. The invention in one respect resides in the findings that both reduced nitrate and reduced sulfate pathways outperform gastrointestinal methanogenesis in ruminants and that the effects of nitrate and sulfate methanogenesis reduction are completely additive. At the same time it has been found that the combined administration of nitrate and sulfate is totally effective in preventing or lessening the potential problems of nitrite intoxication normally encountered when using nitrate alone, the effect of which is further enhanced, where necessary, by the addition of a probiotic microorganism. that reduces nitrite. Consequently, the products are provided comprising high amounts of a combination of a nitrate compound and a sulfate compound and optionally a nitrite-reducing probiotic microorganism, as well as methods of reducing gastrointestinal methanogenesis in ruminants using such compositions.
公开号:BR112012001524B1
申请号:R112012001524-9
申请日:2010-07-23
公开日:2021-02-23
发明作者:Hindrik Bene Perdok；John Richard Newbold；Sander Martijn Van Zijderveld；Ronald Alfred Leng；Rob Bernard Anton Hulshof；David Deswysen；Walter Jan Jozef Gerrits；Jan Dijkstra
申请人:Provimi Holding B.V；
IPC主号:

专利说明:

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to the field of feed additives and supplements for ruminants. More particularly, the invention relates to the reduction of gastrointestinal methanogenesis in ruminants with the aid of inhibiting agents that compete for the hydrogen atoms required by methanogens during normal fermentation of ingested food. The present invention provides, among others, feed supplements and feed compositions comprising the inhibiting agents and their non-therapeutic use to reduce methanogenesis. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Methanogenesis is the main route of elimination of hydrogen (H2) during the rumen fermentation process (Beauchemin et al., 2008). The removal of H2 from the rumen environment is essential for the efficient continuation of rumen fermentation, however the methane resulting from methanogenesis was involved both as a loss of dietary energy for the animal (Johnson and Johnson, 1995) as a significant greenhouse gas contributing to global warming (Steinfeld et al., 2006). Both subjects led to a global search for feed additives to decrease methane production in ruminants.
One of the options explored to reduce methane emissions is the reorientation of excess H2 in processes that provide more beneficial products to the ruminant, thereby decreasing methanogenesis. Examples include stimulation of propiogenesis by adding propionate precursors and attempts to introduce reduced acetogenesis into the rumen (Joblin, 1999, Molano and others, 2008). Successful induction of these processes in the rumen would provide propionate or acetate, respectively, as nutrients for the animal, while at the same time reducing the availability of H2 for methanogenesis. However, the introduction of propionate precursors (malate and fumarate) has provided variable effects on methane production (Asanuma et al., 1999, Ungerfeld et al., 2007) and attempts to introduce reduced acetogenesis into the rumen have so far failed due to a lower affinity for hydrogen when compared to methanogenesis (Le Van et al., 1998).
Other options for reducing methane emissions have been described in US 5,843,498, which refers to ruminant feed compositions to decrease rumen methanogenesis and improve feed efficiency comprising, as an effective component, cysteine and / or its salts.
A small number of research groups have investigated the potential for nitrate as a methane-reducing feed additive, and the addition of nitrate appears to consistently decrease methanogenesis (Guo et al., 2009, Sar et al., 2005, Takahashi et al., 1998).
The possibility of introducing nitrate (NO3) as an alternative hydrogen sink to reduce methanogenesis in the rumen has been largely ignored, due to consistent findings of toxic effects of nitrite that is formed as an intermediate during the reduction of nitrate in ammonia in the rumen (Lewis, 1951 ). High doses of nitrate in ruminant diets have been reported to cause methemoglobinemia, reducing the blood's ability to transport oxygen to animal tissues. In addition, it is known that the accumulation of nitrite in the rumen reduces the microbial activity in the rumen, which, among other things, can reduce feed intake by the animal.
It has been suggested to supplement ruminants fed with high content of nitrate with format, lactate or fumarate, to alleviate the inhibiting effect of nitrite in fermentation (Iwamoto, 1999; Iwamoto, 2001). Simultaneous administration of nitrate and GOS or nisin has also been reported as an effective measure to decrease the concentration of rumen and nitrite in plasma and methemoglobin, while maintaining rumen methanogenesis at a low level, compared to nitrate treatment alone (Sar, 2004 ).
The acceleration of nitrite reduction using probiotics was also the subject of extensive research. US patent number 6,120,810 teaches to reduce the poisoning of ruminant by nitrates by administering to the animal a composition containing an effective amount of the nitrite-reducing microorganism Propionibacterium acidiproprionici. European patent application no. 1 630 226 discloses a feed composition for ruminants containing a microbe having nitrite reductase activity, which is selected from intestinal bacteria, coryneform bacteria, Bacillus subtilis, bacteria of the genus Methylophilus, Actinomyces, ruminal bacteria and combinations thereof. It was also reported (Sar, 2005) that E. Goli W3110 could be used to reduce poisoning when nitrate is used to inhibit methanogenesis in ruminants.
Inhibitory effects of sulfur, copper and tungsten compounds on nitrate reduction have been investigated (Takahashi, 1989). The authors report that in the rumen fluid of castrated sheep adapted to nitrate (0.55 g NaNO3 / kg of body weight twice a day) the formation of nitrite was not affected by incubation with Sulfate-S or by incubation with Sulfite-S . Of the S-containing amino acids, methionine proved to be inefficient in inhibiting microbial reduction of nitrate while cysteine significantly decreased nitrite formation. This publication did not refer to or address any methanogenesis-reducing effect. The effectiveness of cysteine in preventing nitrite buildup has been confirmed in later studies (Takahashi, 1991; Takahashi 1998). It is the main objective of the present invention to provide treatments, and compositions for use in them, to further reduce methanogenesis in ruminants while avoiding or overcoming the specific problems associated with nitrite accumulation. Summary of the invention
The present invention resides, in one aspect, in the findings that both reduced nitrate pathways and reduced sulfate pathways overcome gastrointestinal methanogenesis in ruminants and that the reducing effects of nitrate and sulfate methanogenesis obtained when used individually are totally additive, as will be illustrated in detail in the experimental part. The individual effects of nitrate and sulfate appear to be independent.
It has been found at the same time that the combined administration of nitrate and sulfate is totally effective in preventing or lessening the potential problems of nitrite intoxication normally encountered when using nitrate alone, as will be illustrated in more detail in the experimental part.
Surprisingly, while administration of nitrate has been found to reduce enteric methanogen counts, administration of sulfate or a combination of nitrate and sulfate does not. The administration of the combination of nitrate and sulfate, however, significantly reduces the proportion of methanogens in the total bacteria.
Although the scope of the invention is not limited to or reduced or any such underlying theory or hypothesis, it is believed that the reduction of methanogenesis (equation 1) by nitrate is caused by the alternative use of H2 in reducing nitrate to ammonia. It is believed that the reduction of rumen nitrate follows the reduction path described in equation 2. This involves that 8 moles of H are redirected towards the reduction of nitrate, thereby theoretically reducing the production of methane with 1 mole for each mole of fed nitrate. Each 100g of NO3 fed would thus lead to a CH4 reduction of 25.8 g.

The reduction of nitrate in ammonia provides more energy than the reduction of CO2 in CH4 <and could therefore be expected to be the main route of elimination of H2 if sufficient nitrate is available in the rumen. The total reduction of NO3 in NH3 consumes 8 electrons and each mole of reduced nitrate could thus decrease methane emissions by 1 mole of methane. The final product of the reaction, ammonia, can be considered a valuable nutrient for ruminants fed diets low in protein.
As noted above, the present inventors have found that sulfate itself is also a strong effective reducer in reducing methane emissions by a mechanism independent of nitrate reduction. The reduction of sulfate to H2S (equation 3) also consumes 8 electrons and thus offers the same potential to reduce methane emissions such as nitrate per mol.

The discovery that sulfate is also effective in reducing methanogenesis can be explained by the fact that, from a thermodynamic perspective, sulfate reduction is also probably more favorable than methanogenesis. Stoichiometrically, a total reduction of 100 g of sulfate to hydrogen sulfide would reduce CH4 production by 16.7 g.
Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) appears to play a role as an electron donor in reducing NO2 to NH4 +, and supplementation of the diet with sulfate can therefore additionally relieve accumulation of nitrite in the rumen.
It has also been found that results can be further enhanced by additional administration of an effective amount of nitrite-reducing probiotic microorganisms. As will be illustrated in detail in the experimental part, an initial delay is observed in the beginning of the reduction of nitrite by sulfate, which can be explained by a delay in the availability of H2S immediately after ingestion of feed. This, in turn, can cause a reduction in feed intake, and it is therefore an additional objective of the invention to avoid this. The inventors found that this could be accomplished by co-administering certain nitrite-reducing probiotic microorganisms as will be illustrated in more detail in the experimental part. Description of the figures
Figure 1 is a graph showing the production of methane (1 / h) over the course of a 24-hour period in male lambs from the Texel crossing who receive a basal diet or one of three experimental diets, which have been supplemented with a compound of nitrate, a sulfate compound or a combination of a nitrate compound and a sulfate compound.
Figure 2 is a graph showing oxygen consumption (1 / kg MW / h) over the course of a 24-hour period in male lambs from the Texel crossing who receive a basal diet or one of three experimental diets, which have been supplemented with a nitrate compound, a sulfate compound or a combination of a nitrate compound and a sulfate compound.
Figure 3 is a graph showing the concentration of metamoglobin in the blood of cows receiving one of four experimental diets, which were supplemented with nitrate, or one of three combinations of nitrate and increasing amounts of sulfate.
Figure 4 shows the production of gas in the rumen stimulation with various test products. Panels A to C show cumulative gas production at indicated time points. The error bars indicate IF between replication simulation containers and asterisks the statistical difference for the control containing Ca (NO3) 2 + MgSO4 (referred to as "None") with the t-test.
Figure 5 shows methane production in the rumen simulation with various test products. Panel A shows the cumulative methane production after the 12-hour simulation, and panel B shows the proportion of methane in the total gas produced. The error bars indicate IF between replication simulation container and asterisks the statistical difference for the control containing Ca (NO3) 2 + MgSO4 (referred to as "None") with the t-test.
Figure 6 shows the residual nitrate concentration in the rumen simulation with various test products. Panels A to C show the residual nitrate concentration after 21, 4 and 12 hours of fermentation, respectively. The error bars indicate IF between replication simulation containers and asterisks the statistical difference for the control containing Ca (NO3) 2 + MgSO4 (referred to as "None") with the t-test.
Figure 7 shows the residual nitrite concentration in the rumen simulation with various test products. Panels A to C show the residual nitrite concentration after 2, 4 and 12 hours of fermentation, respectively. The error bars indicate IF between replication simulation containers and asterisks the statistical difference for the control containing Ca (NO3) 2 + MgSO4 (referred to as "None") with the t-test.
Figure 8 shows the residual ammonium concentration in the rumen simulation with various test products. Panels A to C show the residual ammonium concentration after 2, 4 and 12 hours of fermentation, respectively. The error bars indicate IF between replication simulation containers and asterisks the statistical difference for the control containing Ca (NO3) 2 + MgSO4 (referred to as "None") with the t-test. Detailed description of the invention
A first aspect of the invention relates to an animal feed supplement comprising 10-100% of a combination of a nitrate compound and a sulfate compound.
In this document and in its claims, the verb "understand" and its conjugations is used in its non-limiting sense to mean that items after the word are included, but items not specifically mentioned are not excluded. In addition, reference to an element by the indefinite article "one" or "one" does not exclude the possibility that more than one of the element is present, unless the context clearly requires that there be one and only one of the elements. The indefinite article "one" or "one" in this way usually means "at least one".
As used herein, the term "animal feed supplement" refers to a concentrated additive premix comprising the active ingredients, whose premix or supplement can be added to an animal's feed or food to form a supplemented feed according to the present invention. The terms "animal feed premix", "animal feed supplement" and "animal feed additive" are generically considered to have similar or identical meanings and are generally considered interchangeable. Typically, the animal feed supplement of the present invention is in the form of a granulated or compacted powder or solid. In practice, livestock can typically be fed the animal feed supplement by adding it directly to the feed, for example, as a so-called surface fertilizer, or it can be used in the preparation or manufacture of products such as animal feed or a block of salt, which will be described in more detail below. The invention is not particularly limited in this regard. A supplement according to the invention is typically fed to an animal in an amount ranging from 16-2500 g / animal / day. The present animal feed supplement comprises a nitrate compound, typically a physiologically acceptable or tolerated nitrate compound. According to the invention, N-nitrate needs to be readily available for reduction by rumen or intestine microorganisms and the nitrate compound must have sufficient solubility in water. Consequently, according to the present invention the nitrate compound is preferably an ionic nitrate compound, more preferably an inorganic nitrate salt, such as sodium nitrate, potassium nitrate, calcium nitrate, ammonium nitrate, all of which are readily soluble in water at standard pressure and temperature. In addition, from a health and safety perspective, it is typically preferred to use complex inorganic nitrate salts, such as the compound represented by formula 5. Ca (NO3) 2.NH4NO3. IOH2O, which is commercially available from Yara under the trade name 'Calcinit'. The present animal feed supplement also comprises a sulfate compound, typically a physiologically acceptable or tolerated sulfate compound. According to the invention, it is preferred that the sulfate compound is an ionic sulfate compound, more preferably selected from the group than inorganic sulfate salts, many of which are highly soluble in water. Exceptions include calcium sulfate. It is particularly preferred that the present sulphate compound is selected from the group of soluble inorganic sulphate salts, including sodium sulphate, potassium sulphate, magnesium sulphate, zinc sulphate, manganese sulphate, copper sulphate and ferrous sulphate.
In preferred embodiments of the invention, the supplement comprises combining the nitrate compound and the sulfate compound in an amount ranging from 10100% by weight, preferably the amount is in excess of 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 95, 97 or 99% by weight on a dry weight basis.
Since the present invention partly lies in the discovery that, for the purpose of reducing gastrointestinal methanogenesis in the ruminant, nitrate and sulfate are partly interchangeable, the molar ratio between nitrate and sulfate in the supplement can typically range from 100: 11: 50, more preferably 50: 1-1: 10, 25: 1-1: 5 or 10: 11: 2.5, and more preferably 5: 1-1: 1.
The combination of nitrate compound and sulfate compound in the feed supplement of the invention typically provides a total amount of nitrate and sulfate in excess of 50 g / kg, on a dry weight basis. In a preferred embodiment the total amount of nitrate and sulfate exceeds 75 g / kg, more preferably 90 g / kg, more preferably 100 g / kg. In practice, the amount is typically below 750 g / kg. In another preferred embodiment, the amount of sulfate in the feed supplement exceeds 25 g / kg, more preferably 40 g / kg, more preferably 50 g / kg on a dry weight basis. Typically, the amount does not exceed 250 g / kg, preferably does not exceed 200 g / kg, more preferably does not exceed 165 g / kg. In another preferred embodiment, the amount of nitrate in the feed supplement exceeds 20 g / kg, more preferably 30 g / kg, more preferably 40 g / kg on a dry weight basis. Typically the amount is below 600 g / kg, more preferably below 550 g / kg, on a dry weight basis.
All amounts and / or dosages of 'nitrate' and / or 'sulphate' as used herein, refer to the weight of nitrate and / or sulphate comprised in or supplied by the nitrate and / or sulphate compounds, in relation to the total dry weight composition, as will be understood by those skilled in the art. It is understood in the knowledge of the trained professional to determine exactly the ideal quantities of the compounds to be included in the supplement and the quantities of the supplement to be used in the preparation of the feed or compound animal feed, etc., taking into account the specific type of animal and the circumstances under which it is maintained. Preferred dosages for each of the components are provided below. The animal feed supplements of the present invention can comprise any additional ingredient without departing from the scope of the invention. It can typically comprise well-known excipients that are required to prepare the desired product form and can comprise additional additives in order to improve the quality of the feed and / or improve the performance of the animal consuming the supplement. Suitable examples of such excipients include vehicles or fillers, such as lactose, sucrose, mannitol, crystalline cellulose starch, sodium hydrogen carbonate, sodium chloride and the like and binders, such as arabic gum, tragacanth gum, sodium alginate, starch, PVP and derivatives cellulose, etc. examples of feed additives known to those skilled in the art include vitamins, amino acids and residual elements, digestibility enhancers and intestinal flora stabilizers and the like.
In a preferred embodiment, the animal feed supplement further comprises a nitrite-reducing probiotic microorganism. As used here, the term "nitrite probiotic microorganism" refers to live microorganisms that when administered in adequate amounts confer a benefit to the health of the host, by reducing nitrite that accumulates in the rumen and / or intestine to ammonium as explained above. Many examples of such nitrite-reducing microorganisms are known to those skilled in the art. Preferred examples of nitrite-reducing probiotic microorganisms include intestinal and ruminal bacteria having nitrite reductase activity, Propionibacterium acidiproprionici, coryneform bacteria, Bacillus subtilis, bacteria of the genus Methylophilus, Actinomyces and Escherichia coli W3110. More preferably, according to the present invention, the nitrite-reducing probiotic microorganism is selected from the group of Megasphaera elsdenii, in particular ruminal strains of the same, and Propionibacterium acidipropionici, in particular Propionibacterium acidipropionici cepa P4, registered under accession number 55467 na collection of microorganisms from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and commercially available as 'Bova-Pro® concentrate' from Agtech Products Inc.
In a preferred embodiment, an animal feed supplement as defined above is provided, which further comprises the nitrite-reducing probiotic microorganism in an amount of 1.0 * 108-1.0 * 1014 cfu / kg, more preferably 1.0 * 109-1.0 * 1013 cfu / kg, more preferably 1.0 * 1010-1.0 * 1012 cfu / kg, for example, 1.0 * 10n cfu / kg, on a dry weight basis. As is known to those skilled in the art, the colony-forming unit (CFU) is a measure of viable fungal or bacterial numbers. Unlike direct microscopic counts where all cells, dead and living, are counted, CFU measures viable cells and is, for example, determined by expanding a (diluted) sample on a trypticase Agar or Soy Agar and colony count thereby obtained.
In addition, the present inventors have found that good results are obtained when lactic acid or a lactate compound is administered. Without wishing to be limited by any specific theory, it is believed that supplementation of lactate or lactic acid may increase the effectiveness of probiotic microorganisms. Consequently, in a preferred embodiment, a compound animal feed as defined above is provided, which further comprises an effective amount of lactate or a lactic acid, preferably comprises lactic acid or lactate in an amount that exceeds 20 g / kg, more preferably 30 g / kg, more preferably 40 g / kg, on a dry weight basis.
A further aspect of the invention relates to products such as animal feed and a salt block, comprising a supplement as defined above.
Consequently, in one aspect, a compound animal feed composition is provided comprising a combination of a nitrate compound and a sulfate compound, the combination providing a total amount of nitrate and sulfate in excess of 10 g / kg, on a base dry weight. The term 'compound animal feed composition' as used herein, means a composition that is suitable for use as an animal feed and that is mixed with various raw materials or natural or unnatural base and / or additives. Consequently, in particular, the term 'compound' is used here to distinguish the present animal feed compositions from any naturally occurring raw material. These mixtures or compound feeds are formulated according to the specific requirements of the target animal. The main ingredients used in commercially prepared compound feeds typically include wheat bran, rice bran, corn bran, cereal grains such as barley, wheat, rye and oats, soy bran, alfalfa bran, wheat powder and similar. A commercial compound feed will typically comprise not less than 15% crude protein and not less than 70% total digestible nutrients, although the invention is not particularly limited in that regard. Liquid, solid as well as semi-solid animal feed compositions are within the scope of the present invention, solid and semi-solid forms being particularly preferred. These compositions are typically manufactured as a type of bran, pellets or bran. In practice, domestic animals can typically be fed a combination of compound feed, such as that of the present invention, and silage or hay or the like. Typically, a compound animal feed is fed in an amount ranging from 0.3 - 10 kg / animal / day. It is understood in the knowledge of the trained professional to determine the appropriate quantities of these components to be included in the compound animal feed, taking into account the type of animal and the circumstances under which it is kept.
The combination of nitrate compound and sulfate compound in the compound animal feed of the invention typically provides a total amount of nitrate and sulfate in excess of 10 g / kg, on a dry weight basis. In a preferred embodiment the total amount of nitrate and sulfate exceeds 15 g / kg, more preferably 17.5 g / kg, more preferably 20 g / kg. In practice, the amount is typically below 750 g / kg, preferably below 500 g / kg, more preferably below 250 g / kg. In another preferred embodiment, the amount of sulfate in the compound animal feed exceeds 5 g / kg, more preferably 7.5 g / kg, 10 g / kg or 12 g / kg, on a dry weight basis. Typically the amount does not exceed 200 g / kg, preferably does not exceed 175 g / kg, more preferably does not exceed 150 g / kg. In another preferred embodiment, the amount of nitrate in the compound animal feed exceeds 5 g / kg, more preferably 7.5 g / kg, more preferably 10 g / kg, on a dry weight basis. Typically, the amount is below 600 g / kg, more preferably below 500 g / kg, more preferably below 250 g / kg, on a dry weight basis. In addition, in a preferred embodiment, an animal compound feed as defined above is provided, which further comprises the nitrite-reducing probiotic microorganism in an amount of 1.0 * 108-1.0 * 1014 cfu / kg, more preferably 1 , 0 * 109-1.0, 0 * 1013 cfu / kg, more preferably 1.0 * 1010-1.0, 0 * 1012 cfu / kg. In addition, in a preferred embodiment, a compound animal feed as defined above is provided, which further comprises an effective amount of lactate or lactic acid, preferably in an amount that exceeds 5 g / kg, more preferably 7.5 g / kg , more preferably 10 g / kg.
The animal compound feed compositions of the invention may comprise any additional feed additives typically used in the art. As known to those skilled in the art, the term 'feed additive' in this context refers to products used in animal nutrition for the purpose of improving the quality of feed and the quality of food of animal origin, or improving the performance of animals, for example, providing improved digestion capacity for feed materials. Non-limiting examples include technological additives such as preservatives, antioxidants, emulsifiers, stabilizing agents, acidity regulators and silage additives; sensory additives, especially flavors and coloring substances; nutritional additives (additional), such as vitamins, amino acids and residual elements; and (additional) zootechnical additives, such as digestion enhancers and intestinal flora stabilizers.
As will be apparent to those skilled in the art, the present animal compound feed compositions can comprise any additional ingredient or additive, without departing from the scope of the invention.
In a further aspect, the invention provides a salt stone or salt block comprising the supplement of the invention. As known to those skilled in the art such stones or blocks of salt are particularly suitable for feeding mineral supplements (as well as proteins and carbohydrates) to ruminants grazing on both natural and cultivated pastures. Such salt blocks or salt stones according to the present invention typically comprise, in addition to the composition of nitrate compound and sulfate compound and the optional nitrite-reducing probiotic microorganism of the invention, various types of binders, for example, cements, plaster, lime, calcium phosphate, carbonate, and / or gelatin; and optionally additional additives such as vitamins, residual elements, mineral salts, sensory additives, etc.
The combination of nitrate compound and sulfate compound in the salt block of the invention typically provides a total amount of nitrate and sulfate in excess of 15 g / kg, on a dry weight basis. In a preferred embodiment the total amount of nitrate and sulfate exceeds 25 g / kg, more preferably 30 g / kg. In practice the amount is typically below 450 g / kg, preferably below 400 g / kg. In another preferred embodiment, the amount of sulfate in the salt block exceeds 3 g / kg, more preferably 5 g / kg, more preferably 6 g / kg, on a dry weight basis. Typically, the amount does not exceed 150 g / kg, preferably does not exceed 100 g / kg, more preferably does not exceed 75 g / kg. In another preferred embodiment, the amount of nitrate in the salt block exceeds 10 g / kg, more preferably 20 g / kg, more preferably 25 g / kg, on a dry weight basis. Typically the amount is below 400 g / kg, more preferably below 300 g / kg, on a dry weight basis. In a preferred embodiment, a salt block as defined above is provided, which further comprises the nitrite-reducing probiotic microorganism in an amount of 1.0 * 108-1.0 * 1014 cfu / kg, more preferably 1.0 * 109 -1.0 * 1013 cfu / kg, more preferably 1.0 * 1010 -1.0 * 1012 cfu / kg.
A further aspect of the invention relates to a method of reducing gastrointestinal methane production in a ruminant, the method comprising administering to the ruminant an effective amount of a combination of the nitrate compound and the sulfate compound in which the method is non-therapeutic.
The term "reduce gastrointestinal methanogenesis" as used here refers to the reduction of methane gas production in the gastrointestinal tract. As explained earlier, fermentation in the rumen and intestine of a ruminant leads to the production of methane gas by so-called methanogens. The present invention aims to reduce this process, such as reducing the excretion of methane directly from the gastrointestinal tract. It is understood in the knowledge of those trained in the technique to evaluate the excretion of methane by an animal. As explained earlier, the production of methane in the rumen and intestine is a process that normally occurs in healthy animals and decreasing methanogenesis does not increase or decrease the general health or well-being of the ruminant. Nevertheless, a reduction in methane formation using the combination of a nitrate compound and a sulfate compound could increase the efficiency of nutrient use by the animal, such that the present method could increase the growth and / or productivity of the animal. .
As will be readily recognized by those skilled in the art, the present method of treatment will not be effective in treating a condition known as 'swelling'. Swelling is a condition commonly described as an abnormal distension of the rumen as a result of accumulation of gas in the rumen. Gas (carbon dioxide, methane and other gases) is normally produced during rumen fermentation and is not normally erupted through the esophagus, preventing the accumulation of gases. During the incidence of swelling, the esophagus is blocked by a layer of foam. The opening of the esophagus contains receptors that block the esophagus if liquid (or foam) is felt. The foam that is formed during swelling originates from the rapid fermentation of small particles of feed. The cause of swelling is the formation of foam and not the production of ruminal gases, which is a naturally occurring process in the ruminant. As a consequence, methane production cannot be seen as a cause of swelling and methane reduction cannot be seen as a treatment for swelling. The therapeutic treatment against swelling is aimed at preventing the formation of the foam layer in the rumen or its removal, not at preventing the production of ruminal gases. In addition, carbon dioxide is the main gas produced during rumen fermentation. The present method is therefore neither intended nor suitable for treating swelling or for alleviating its symptoms.
Thus, the present method of treatment is a non-therapeutic method of treatment, that is, the method does not improve the health of an animal suffering from a specific condition, nor does it prevent a specific disease or condition, nor does it even affect health at any point. ruminant in any other way, that is, in comparison with a ruminant that does not receive the present method of treatment. The advantages of the present method are limited to environmental and / or economic aspects as explained above.
Taxonomically, a ruminant is a mammal of the order Artiodátila that digests plant-based food by softening it initially in the animal's first stomach, known as rumen, then regurgitating the semi-digested mass, now known as ruminant food, and ruminating the same again. The process of ruminating food to further break down plant material and stimulate digestion is called "rumination". Ruminant mammals include cattle, goats, sheep, giraffes, bison, yaks, buffalo, deer, camels, alpacas, llamas, wildebeest, antilope, antilocapro and nilgó. The present invention relates mainly to methods of treating domesticated ruminants, especially those kept for commercial breeding of domestic animals. Thus, in a preferred embodiment of the invention, the ruminant is selected from the group of cattle, goats, sheep and buffalo.
A preferred embodiment of the invention provides a method as defined above, in which the combination of nitrate compound and sulfate compound is administered to the ruminant in an amount that provides a total dosage of nitrate and sulfate in excess of 0.05 g / kg of body weight per day. In a preferred embodiment the total dosage of nitrate and sulfate in the present method is in the range of 0.05 - 10 kg / kg of body weight per day, more preferably 0.1-5 g / kg of body weight per day, more preferably 0.2 - 2.5 g / kg body weight per day.
In another preferred embodiment a method as defined above is provided, wherein the sulfate dosage is in the range of 0.025 - 1.8 g / kg of body weight per day, more preferably in the range of 0.05 - 0.9 g / kg body weight per day, more preferably 0.1 - 0.45 g / kg body weight per day.
In another preferred embodiment, a method as defined above is provided, wherein the nitrate dosage is in the range of 0.025 - 8 g / kg body weight per day, more preferably 0.05 - 4 g / kg body weight per day , more preferably 0.1-2 g / kg body weight per day.
The dosages defined here as the amount per kg of body weight per day refer to the average amount of the respective compound during a given treatment period, for example, during a week or a month of treatment. The compounds can thus be administered every day, every other day, every other day, etc., without departing from the scope of the invention. Although preferably, the method comprises daily administration of the combination of the nitrate compound and sulfate compound at the prescribed dosages. Even more preferably the combination is administered during feeding of the animal every time the animal is fed, in amounts that provide the above daily dosages. As explained earlier, the rumen microflora's ability to reduce nitrate to nitrite from animals not previously adapted to nitrate in their diet exceeds its ability to reduce nitrite to ammonia. This can result in a liquid accumulation of nitrite in the rumen, which is readily absorbed through the rumen wall and converts the blood hemoglobin from the ferrous to the iron form, methemoglobin, rendering the hemoglobin molecule unable to transport oxygen to the tissues. The resulting condition, methemoglobinemia, is a state of general anoxia, which in white cases may decrease the animal's performance, but in severe cases it may result in the animal's death. The present inventors have established that, in the present method, careful introduction of nitrate into the diet of sheep allows the rumen microflora to adapt and increase its ability to reduce both nitrate and nitrite in the diet of sheep. The sheep slowly adapted to diets with high nitrate content, showed not to experience clinical signs of methemoglobinemia. Consequently, in a preferred embodiment of the invention, the method comprises a first phase of nitrate adaptation and a second phase of continuous treatment, the first phase comprising two or more, preferably three or more, consecutive periods of at least 3 days, preferably at least 4 days, more preferably at least 5 days, where the average daily dosage of nitrate during each period is less than 100% of the average daily dosage administered during the second phase and where the average daily dosage during each period is higher than than the average daily dosage during the period preceding it. In a preferred embodiment, the increase in average daily dosage of nitrate from one period to the next is less than 1 g / kg body weight per day, preferably less than 0.5, more preferably less than 0.25 , more preferably less than 0.1 g / kg of body weight per day. Preferably, the second phase comprises a period of more than 5, 10, 25, 50, 100, 250 or 350 days of administering the combination of the nitrate compound and the sulfate compound in an average daily dosage in the range of 0.15 - 3 g / kg body weight.
The methods defined above with or without initial adaptation phase, in a preferred embodiment, also include administering to the ruminant the nitrite-reducing probiotic microorganism as defined above. It is particularly preferred to administer the probiotic microorganism in an amount of 1.0 * 105 -1.0 * 1014 cfu / kg of body weight per day, more preferably 1.0 * 107 -1.0 * 1013 cfu / kg of body weight per day, more preferably 1.0 * 109-1.0 * 10112 cfu / kg body weight per day. In a preferred embodiment, the methods comprise administration of probiotic microorganism and administration of lactic acid or lactate. It is particularly preferred to administer lactic acid or lactate in an amount of at least 0.025 g / kg of body weight per day, more preferably 0.05 - 5 g / kg of body weight per day, more preferably 0.1 - 2.5 g / kg body weight per day. The present method can comprise the administration of the combination of the nitrate compound, sulfate compound and, optionally, the nitrite-reducing probiotic microorganism according to the dosage regimes described above for a period of at least 5, 10, 25, 50, 100, 250 or 350 days. As noted earlier, an interesting aspect of the invention resides in the fact that the present method provides very persistent efficacy in reducing enteric methanogenesis, that is, the effect does not diminish during prolonged periods of treatment, for example, as a result of increasing resistance of intestinal microorganisms or rumen, thereby making the ruminant's long-term treatment particularly feasible.
As will be apparent from the above, the present method comprises oral administration of the combination of the nitrate compound and sulfate compound and, optionally, the nitrite-reducing probiotic microorganism. Preferably, the treatment comprises the oral administration of the compound animal feed compositions and / or the animal feed supplement products as defined above, although other liquid, solid or semi-solid oral ingestible compositions can be used without departing the scope of the invention, as will be understood by those skilled in the art.
According to the above, a further aspect of the invention relates to the use of a composition comprising a combination of the nitrate compound and the sulfate compound for non-therapeutic reduction of gastrointestinal methane production in a ruminant. It is preferred that the use comprises administering the combination of the nitrate compound and sulfate compound to the ruminant in an amount that provides a total dosage of nitrate and sulfate that exceeds 0.05 g / kg body weight per day. Preferably, the nitrate compound and sulfate compound are used in the dosages as described above. In another preferred embodiment the use further comprises administering to the ruminant the nitrite-reducing probiotic microorganism at dosages as previously described. Even more preferably, the use of any of the compositions as defined above is provided for non-therapeutic reduction of gastrointestinal methane production in a ruminant.
Another aspect of the invention relates to therapeutic treatments of ruminants supplemented with nitrate. As explained above, it is known that nitrate supplementation in ruminants will help to reduce gastrointestinal methanogenesis, but it also increases the risk of incidence of nitrite accumulation, the so-called 'nitrate toxicity syndrome7 and / or methemoglobinemia, reducing the blood blood capacity transport oxygen to animal tissues. In addition, the accumulation of nitrite in the rumen is known to reduce microbial activity in the rumen, which among other things can reduce animal feed intake. As explained earlier, the present inventors have established that administration to such ruminants supplemented with nitrate of a sulfate compound, preferably in combination with a nitrite-reducing probiotic microorganism, greatly reduces or even avoids these adverse effects.
Accordingly, one aspect of the invention relates to a method of treating or preventing nitrite build-up, 'nitrate toxicity syndrome' and / or methemoglobinemia in ruminants supplemented with nitrate comprising administering to the ruminant an effective amount of the sulphate compound, optionally in combination with an effective amount of the nitrite-reducing probiotic microorganism.
Another aspect of the invention relates to a preparation comprising the sulfate compound, optionally in combination with the nitrite-reducing probiotic microorganism, for use in the method of treating or preventing nitrite accumulation, 'nitrate toxicity syndrome' and / or methemoglobinemia in ruminants supplemented with nitrate.
Yet another aspect of the invention relates to the use of the sulfate compound, optionally in combination with the nitrite-reducing probiotic microorganism, in the manufacture of the preparation for use in a method of treating or preventing nitrite buildup, 'nitrate toxicity syndrome' and / or methemoglobinemia in ruminants supplemented with nitrate.
According to the above, the method of treating and / or preventing nitrite build-up, 'nitrate toxicity syndrome' and / or methemoglobinemia typically comprises administering the compositions in sufficient quantities to provide a total sulfate dosage in the range of 0.025 - 1.8 g / kg body weight per day, more preferably 0.05 - 0.9 g / kg body weight per day, more preferably 0.1 - 0.45 g / kg body weight per day, and, optionally, a total dosage of the probiotic microorganism of 1.0 * 105 -1.0 * 1014 cfu / kg of body weight per day, more preferably 1.0 * 107 -1.0 * 1013 cfu / kg of body weight per day , more preferably 1.0 * 109-1.0 * 1012 cfu / kg body weight per day. In a preferred embodiment, the method comprises administering a probiotic microorganism and administering lactic acid or lactate. It is particularly preferred to administer lactic acid or lactate in an amount of at least 0.025 g / kg of body weight per day, more preferably 0.05 - 5 g / kg of body weight per day, more preferably 0.1 - 2.5 g / kg body weight per day.
As used here, the term 'nitrate supplemented ruminant' refers to a ruminant that receives substantial amounts of nitrate, typically through feeding. Preferably, the ruminant is supplemented with nitrate in amounts sufficient to decrease gastrointestinal methanogenesis, more preferably in amounts in excess of 0.025 g / kg of body weight per day, more preferably 0.05 - 8 g / kg of body weight per day. As will be understood by those skilled in the art, the method may be equally appropriate to treat or prevent nitrite build-up, 'nitrate toxicity syndrome' and / or methemoglobinemia in ruminants that receive substantial amounts of nitrate for other purposes or even unintentionally, for example, as a result of environmental conditions.
The invention as described above will be illustrated and explained in more detail in the following experimental part, which is in no way intended to limit the scope of the invention. Example 1: methane nitrate and sulfate decrease Materials and methods Animals and accommodation
In the current experiment the properties of reducing sulfate methane and dietary nitrate were evaluated. Both nitrate and sulfate were slowly introduced into the diet over an adaptation period of 4 weeks. Food intake and growth were monitored during the experiment. The hypothesis was raised that both nitrate and dietary sulfate would reduce methane emissions from enteric fermentation.
The Animal Care and use Committee of the Animal Sciences Group, WUR, Lelystad approved the experimental protocol for this experiment. The experiment was carried out with 20 male Texel crossing lambs, weighing 42.9 ± 4.3 kg (mean ± standard deviation) at the beginning of the experiment. During a four-week adaptation phase up to the diet additives, the animals were housed in individual puppy cages to allow individual feeding. The rams were weighed weekly to monitor growth throughout the experiment.
After the adaptation period, four animals (one block) were housed in indirect breathing calorimetry chambers for one week to determine gas exchange. In the following weeks a new block of sheep was introduced into the chambers weekly. Each breathing chamber housed an individual ram. The breathing calorimetry chambers used are described in detail in Verstegen et al. (1987). The temperature was maintained at 15 ° C, and the relative humidity was adjusted to 70%. The ventilation rate was 70 1 / min. for a chamber type and 90 1 / min. for another type.
Air entering and leaving the chambers was analyzed for CO2, O2 and CH4 at 9 min intervals. the net production or consumption of these gases was calculated from the difference in concentrations between inlet and outlet air multiplied by airflow and subsequently recalculated for standard circumstances (0 ° C, 101 kPa, without water vapor). Experimental design
The experiment was designed as a 2x2 factorial design, with nitrate and sulfate as factors. The animals were arranged in blocks by weight and subsequently a block randomly distributed to one of four diet treatments: CON, NO3, SO4 or NO3 + SO4. food
The basal diet consisted of 74% corn silage, 16% cut barley straw, 9% soy meal treated with formaldehyde and 1% mineral premix on a DM basis. Diet additives were included in a mixture (table 1) that was added to the basal diet at 10% DM diet. In the food, the premixes were mixed by hand in the diets. Water was freely available during the experiment. Nitrate was supplemented from a commercially available source (Calcinit, Yara) and supplemental SO4 was added to the diet in the form of anhydrous MgSO4.
During the adaptation phase, the sheep were introduced to the experimental premixtures in 25% steps per week. The lambs were fed once a day at 8:30 am. Before feeding in the morning, residues were removed from the feed containers and weighed to determine voluntary feed intake. During the week in the breathing chambers, the availability of feed was limited to 95% of the feed consumed by the animal, consuming the minimum amount of feed in a block in the week before accommodation in the breathing chambers. The feed restriction was applied to avoid interactions between the effect of DM1 additives and the effect on methane production.
Nitrate in experimental diets was switched to urea in the control diet to maintain isonitrogenic diets. Limestone was added to the control diet to ensure an equal intake of Ca between treatments. MgO was included in the diet to obtain similar levels of Mg between diets. The volume of different additions to the diets was different for each treatment, and wood cellulose was used to balance this. Table 1: composition of mixtures containing the experimental additives (% DM)
2 chemical formula 5Ca (NO3) 2.NH4NO3. IOH2O Blood, rumen and liver sampling
Blood was sampled at d2, d8, dl5, d22 and d28 at 1, 3 and 5 h after feeding. Days 2, 8, 15 and 22 were all 1 day after an incremental step of 25% of the experimental premix in the diet. On the 28th, the lambs were on 100% of the diet treatments for a week. Blood samples were taken in collection tubes containing heparin (Vacutainers) and stored in the refrigerator directly after sampling. At the end of the sampling day, the samples were dispatched for analysis and were analyzed the next day. The blood methemoglobin content was determined by the methods described in Evelyn and Malloy (1938).
After the period in the breathing chambers ended, the sheep were slaughtered and rumen fluid samples (200 ml) were taken from the rumen as soon as possible after slaughter. The samples were immersed in ice water directly after sampling to stop microbial fermentation and frozen after taking all samples. At slaughter, duplicate liver samples were taken, cooled and frozen for further assessment of vitamin A status. Results and discussion Blood methemoglobin contents during adaptation period
During supplementation of the diet with 25% or 50% of the inclusion rate of final premix, none of the sheep had a positive blood MetHb content (<2% Hb). When 75% of the inclusion rate was included in the diet, a sheep in the NO3 diet tested positive 3 h after feeding, but the value was only 3% Hb. When the sheep were at the inclusion rate of 100% for one week (d28) two sheep in the NO3 treatment tested positive with metHb values of 7% and 3% Hb respectively at 3 h after feeding. The sheep in the control diet and diets containing sulfate never had MetHb levels higher than 2% Hb (limit of detection), possibly indicating that S plays a role in reducing rumen nitrite. The 4-week adaptation period was apparently sufficient to avoid any significant problems associated with nitrite and methemoglobinemia toxicity. A similar finding was reported by Alaboudi and Jones (1985). Nitrate levels of 2.9% DM would be considered lethal to non-adapted ruminants, however the adaptation apparently allowed rumen bacteria to increase their capacity to reduce nitrite.
Growth and feed intake during adaptation to dietary sulfate and nitrate
Feed intake was no different as a result of the addition of NO3 or SO4 (table 2), but tended to be lower when the total dose of nitrate was provided. However, with inclusions greater than 25% of the final inclusion rate, feed intake was comparatively reduced (approximately 9% in the period beyond week 1) as a result of the inclusion of NO3a. The low number of animals used in this study makes it impossible to draw conclusions about the effects on feed intake, but the lowest compatible feed intake should not be ignored. Bruning-Fann and Kaneene (1993) report that in sheep negative effects on feed intake were observed when dietary nitrate levels exceeded 3% of dietary DM. This reduction in feed intake may be related to a nitrite-induced decrease in cell wall intake as demonstrated in vitro by Marais et al. (1988). Feeding of NO3 or SO4 did not affect body weight gain (Table 3) . Table 2: feed intake (g / lamb / day) during the weeks adaptation stage to diet additives
Table 3: body weight (BW; kg / lamb) and body weight gain (BWG; kg / sheep / week) during the adaptation stage to diet additives

Table 4: feed intake, gas exchange and heat production during the week of measurement in the breathing chambers

Effects of NO3 and SO4 on gas exchange
The gas flows determined in the breathing chambers are shown in table 4. The limit feed that was applied during this part of the experiment resulted in a very similar feed intake between treatments. Methane production was decreased by 34% as a result of adding the nitrate source to the diet.
The sheep in the treatment of NO3 in the applicants' experiment consumed an average of 24.9 g of NO3 per day, which theoretically would decrease methane production by 6.4 g. the effective decrease in methane production in the treatment with NO3 was 8.11, which corresponds to 5.8 g of CH4 (CH4 = 0.714 g / 1). Thus, the decrease in methane production is actually somewhat lower than can be explained by stoichiometry, which can be explained by an incomplete reduction of nitrate in ammonia or use of nitrate in other processes than a reduced reduction in nitrate. The source of nitrate used in this study was highly soluble and therefore it is likely that most of the nitrate was available for reduction in the rumen. However, much of the dissolved nitrate would have been in the liquid phase of the rumen and may have passed out of the rumen before being reduced.
The addition of sulfate led to a 19% reduction in daily methane production.
In the applicants' study, sheep treated with SO4 consumed an average of 27.0 g of SCú / day, which would correspond to a 4.5 g methane reduction. the observed effective decrease in methane reduction was 4 1, or 2.9 g. the difference in theoretical capacity for SO4 as a hydrogen sink and its observed ability to reduce methane emissions may be in the solubility of MgSÜ4 in the rumen.
The sheep in the SO4 treatments were fed with a considerable amount of S in the diet (7.4 g added S / kg DM). This level is well above the maximum recommendations as indicated by NRC (4 g / k DM). Feeding above this upper limit increases the risk of polioencephalomalacia, due to high levels of H2S occurring in the upper rumen space and subsequent inhalation of H2S. the results from this experiment, effectively show, however, that SO4 is effective in reducing methane production. When fed at recommended levels (2-4 g S / kg DM), SO4 is expected to have a reducing effect on methane production. Oxygen consumption and CO2 production were both lower as a consequence of nitrate treatment. High doses of nitrate in ruminant diets have been reported to cause methemoglobinemia, reducing the blood's ability to transport oxygen to animal tissues. However, in this experiment the blood was sampled on a regular basis and slightly elevated MetHb levels were only found in two sheep (maximum level was 7% Hb) and it seems unlikely to explain the lower consumption of O2. The lower consumption of O2 may reflect a different metabolism when nitrate is fed. Sar et al. (2004) also observed a lower consumption of O2 and a lower production of CO2 when 0.9 g of NCb / kg0'75 of BW was dosed intraruminally for sheep. In this study considerably more nitrate was fed (1.4 g NCb / kg0'75 BW) but the MetHb levels in the applicants' study were considerably lower (18.4% Hb in the Sar and others study). This is probably due to the absence of an adaptation period in the study by Sar et al. (2004) and the fact that nitrate was dosed as a solution in the rumen.
In another study (Takahashi et al., 1998) NaNCh was dosed in the rumen of sheep at a rate of 1.5 g / kg BW0'75, which was very similar to the concentration used in the applicants' study. MetHb concentrations up to more than 30% were observed and from the study data it was concluded that for every 10% increase in MetHb, oxygen consumption decreases by 10.3%. In the applicants' study, a 6% reduction in oxygen consumption was observed. Using the regression equation by (Takahashi et al., 1998), this would mean that the animals would have had MetHb levels of approximately 5%. In two animals similar levels (3 and 7% Hb) were actually observed.
Methane production in the control treatment was typical for sheep fed on the limit once a day. The animals were fed at 8 am, after which the methane production progressively increased to reach the maximum methane production in 5-6 h after feeding. Since the animals were fed at the limit and only fed once a day, methane production declined successively after the peak. The addition of nitrate to the feed invoked a markedly different pattern of methane production; immediately after feeding, the methane production rate remained at a much lower level and the hypothesis was raised that in this period hydrogen was used to reduce nitrate, thereby limiting the availability of H2 for methanogenesis. Ten hours after feeding, the rate of methane production was no longer different from the control treatment, probably reflecting the absence of nitrate-containing feed and a return to methanogenesis as an H-sink. although methane production was significantly lower after feeding as a result of the nitrate fed, methane production was never reduced to 0 and the reduction of nitrate and methanogenesis occurred simultaneously. The baseline level of methane production can at least be partially explained by methane production from large intestine fermentation. Nitrate is unlikely to reach the large intestine without being reduced, and nitrate feeding is therefore likely not to influence methane production in that part of the gastrointestinal tract.
The rate of methane production from the SO4 treatment was never different from the control treatment but was consistently lower than the control treatment over the entire 24 h period. the same was observed when treatment with SO4 was compared with treatment with NO3 + SO4. Evidently, the effects of NO3 and SO4 on methane production are complementary and the effect of SO4 seems to be less dependent on the availability of feed containing SO4.
The results of the experiment are also represented in the graph of figure 1, showing the production of methane (1 / h) during the course of a period of 24 in the groups receiving the basal diet or one of the three experimental diets.
Oxygen consumption during the course of a 24-hour period
Directly after feeding at 8 am, oxygen consumption was 10-18% lower for treatment with NO3. This phenomenon coincides with the production of methane markedly reduced in the period after feeding for the treatment with NO3. The hypothesis is raised that in this period the significant reduction of nitrate occurred in the rumen, with the production of nitrite as an intermediate in the treatment with NO3. The presence of nitrite during this period could explain the lower oxygen consumption of the treatment with NO3. Although MetHb levels beyond 7%
Hb was never observed for treatment with NO3, a definite reduction in oxygen consumption was observed. The storage time of the samples (samples were analyzed approximately 24 h after sampling), could explain the lower MetHb levels of the expected gas, found.
In the treatment with NO3 + SO4, oxygen consumption was only lower directly after feeding (9 am) and recovered to the same level as the control treatment after that point of time. The addition of SO4 apparently alleviates the decrease in oxygen consumption invoked by the nitrate feed. Possibly, SO4 was reduced to H2S in the period directly after feeding and played a role in the acceleration of nitrite reduction as proposed. A clear dose-dependent acceleration of nitrite reduction was found earlier when sulfide was added to rumen fluid in vitro (Takahashi et al., 1989). The acceleration in nitrite reduction was much less when SO4 was added to the medium and therefore it seems plausible that it was H2S, which actively recovered oxygen consumption in the applicants' experiment.
The results of the experiment are also represented in the graph of figure 2, showing the oxygen consumption (1 / kg MW / h) during the curing of a period of 24 h in the groups that receive the basal diet or one of the three experimental diets. Example II: effect of sulfate on methemoglobinemia in cattle supplemented with nitrate
The effect of dietary sulfate intake on the concentration of metamoglobin in the blood of cows supplemented with nitrate was evaluated. The hypothesis was raised that dietary sulfate would reduce the accumulation of nitrite in the rumen of cows fed with nitrate and consequently prevent the formation of metamoglobin in blood. Material and methods Experimental design
The experiment was a randomized block design, with 4 animals per block and different doses of sulfate as treatments. The animals were divided into a block by milk yield and subsequently in a block randomly distributed for one of four diet treatments: NO3, NO3 + SO4 low, NO3 + SO4 medium, NO3 + SO4 high. food
The basal diet consisted of 45% corn silage, 7.5% dry alfalfa, 4.1% cut barley straw, and 42% of a premix concentrated in a DM base. Diet additives were included in the premix (table 5). In the feed, the pre-mixes were distributed to the cows as part of a total mixed feed. The water was freely available during the experiment. Nitrate was supplemented from a commercially available source (Calcinit, Yara AS, Norway) and supplemental SO4 was added to the diet in the form of anhydrous MgSÜ4.Table 5: composition of mixtures containing the experimental additives (% DM)

During the adaptation phase, the cows were introduced to the experimental premixes at 25% per week steps (table 6). Table 6: composition of experimental concentrate combinations during the adaptation phase
Blood sampling
The blood was sampled 3h after feeding twice a week throughout the experiment to closely monitor the metamoglobin concentration. The blood was collected in evacuated tubes containing heparin, immediately dipped in ice water and stored in a refrigerator at 4 C. At the end of each sampling day, samples were dispatched for analysis and were analyzed the next day. The metamoglobin content of the blood was determined by the method of Evelyn and Malloy (1938). On day 37, when nitrate was fed at its maximum inclusion rate (3% nitrate on a DM basis), blood sampling was performed more frequently (-0.5 h, 0.5 h, 1.5 h, 3 h , 5 h and 8 h after feeding) to establish the kinetics of nitrate and its various metabolites in plasma. Results and discussion Blood methemoglobin contents during adaptation period
None of the cows had blood metamoglobin detected during supplementation of the diet with 25% or 50% of the final nitrate inclusion rate. When nitrate was added to the diet at 75% of the final inclusion rate, cows that were not supplemented with sulfate had elevated hemoglobin in their blood at 3 h after feeding. In contrast, cows that received sulfate in their diet tested negative for methamoglobin, regardless of the amount of S supplied. At the inclusion rate of 100% nitrate, all treatments showed an increase in metamoglobin in the blood although the increase was more pronounced for nitrate cows alone, compared to those that received nitrate and sulfate. Among cows supplemented with sulfate, it was not possible to distinguish a feat from the dose of sulfate (see table 7). It was concluded that sulfate was able to neutralize the accumulation of nitrite in the rumen, consequently avoiding (in moderate addition of nitrate) or reducing (in high addition of nitrate) the formation of metamoglobin in the blood.Table 7: metamoglobin in the blood (% of hemoglobin )
Means with different envelopes are significantly different (P <0.1). The results of the experiment are also represented in the graph of figure 3, showing the concentration of metamoglobin in the blood receiving one of the four experimental diets. of cows Example III: effect of Megasphaera elsdenii and Selenomonas ruminantium on the rate of reduction of nitrite and nitrate in the rumen fermentation model
In the present experiment the kinetics of nitrate reduction in a rumen fermentation system in vitro were studied and the effects on it by M. elsdenii and S. ruminantium. Materials and methods
The feed used in rumen simulation was 15 grams of dry matter and composed of grass silage (0.5 g of dry matter) and the commercial compound feed, 0.5 g of dry matter. The treatments were as indicated in the following table:
*) treatments 2 to 17 contain 7.52 mg MgSO4 / 40 ml. All treatments were done in quadruples, the total number of simulation vessels being 72. The dry feed and Calcinit components were weighed in serum bottles, the bottles washed with CO2 passed through a hot copper catalyst to purge O2, and sealed with thick butyl rubber tops, 36.5 ml of reduced temperature-adjusted (+ 37 ° C), anaerobic buffer solution were introduced into each simulation vessel under the flow of oxygen-free CO2. Bacterial cultures grown overnight, MgSOé solution, lactate solution and buffer solution to equal the total liquid volume to 1.5 ml / container were added. Finally, 2 ml of fresh sieved rumen fluid was added to the serum bottles, the final volume being 40 ml. This inoculation started the simulation of effective rumen. The inoculation time for each container was recorded and taken into account when sampling and stopping fermentation.
The rumen fermentation simulation continued for 12 hours at 37 ° C. During fermentation the total gas production was measured after 2, 4, 6, 9 and 12 hours of simulation to get an idea about the general metabolic activity of the rumen microbes.
All gas produced during the 12 hours in each simulation vessel was individually collected from each of the 72 vessels in an evacuated 2-liter infusion bottle that had pre-introduced ethane as an internal standard. These samples were analyzed for methane to see the effect of treatments on the total methane produced by rumen bacteria during the 12 hours. The analysis was performed by gas chromatography using a flame ionization detector and methane and pure ethane as standards.
At 4 and 12 hours all simulation containers were analyzed for volatile fatty acids (VFAs) and lactic acid (collectively referred to as SCFAs). The acids were analyzed by gas chromatography using a conditioned column for the analysis of free acids. The quantified SCFAs were acetic, propionic, butyric, iso-butyric, 2-methyl-butyric, valeric, iso-valeric and lactic acids. NO3 and NO2 were analyzed from all simulation vessels at 0, 2, 4 and 12 hours. The method was spectrophotometric and based on nitrate reduction with vanadium (III) combined with detection by an acidic Griess reaction. NH4 was analyzed from all simulation vessels at 0, 2, 4 and 12 hours. The method was colorimetric and based on a phenol-hypochlorite reaction.
The statistical analysis consisted of two-tailed t-tests for all measured parameters. The tests were performed against treatment with Calcinit and MgSO4 splicing (treatments 2 and 17). The t-test was chosen to let the individual treatments be independent of the other treatments tested simultaneously. The results are marked in the figures, where 0.01 <p-value <0.05 is indicated as *; 0.001 <p-value <0.01 is indicated as: **; 0.0001 <p-value <0.001 is indicated as ***; and p-value <0.0001 is indicated as ****. Results of Effect of treatments on total gas production
In this work, the applicants inoculated all containers with 5% rumen fluid, however, in addition, some recipients received a dose of Selenomonas ruminantium or Megasphaera elsdenii. These bacteria are the main means of using lactate in the rumen and, in addition, are believed to have the ability to reduce nitrate and / or nitrite. M. elsdenii was also tested in combination with lactic acid, the reasoning being that lactic acid is a substrate for the bacterium and could have a positive effect on its competitiveness in the rumen microcosm. As shown in figure 4, the addition of NO3 and MgSCU caused significant suppression of gas production. This effect was most accentuated when time passed; almost 25% of cumulative gas production suppression was measured at a 12-hour time point. When compared to the treatment enriched with nitrate, inoculum of S. ruminantium had a positive effect on gas production during the first 4 hours. This achievement was statistically significant at doses 100 and 1000 μl / 40 ml. The initial gas production was also stimulated by M. esdenii, but only at the highest dose of 1000 μl. when lactic acid was supplied the gas production was suppressed, which may be due to its direct inhibitory effect on the metabolism of rumen microbiotics. The stimulating effect of S. ruminantium was not detected at the time points later. However, the higher dose of M. esldenii continued to increase cumulative gas production, the relative positive effect being even more significant at the time points later. The addition of lactic acid continued to suppress the dose of gas production dependent for the duration of the incubation. However, in combination with lactate, the high dose of M. elsdenii canceled the metabolic suppression and, in reality, transformed it into stimulation of gas production. Despite the fact that M. elsdenii stimulated the production of general gas at a high dose, it could not completely overcome the negative effect of nitrate.
Effect of treatments on methane production Applicants quantified the CH4 produced in addition to the total gas production. In this fermentation study the methane proportion of the total produced was relatively low, remaining clearly below 10% (figure 5B). the level of methane production depends on the diet and physiological status of the cow used as a rumen fluid donor. In this case the animal was a dairy cow on a high energy diet. Dietary nitrate suppressed absolute methane production by almost 80% (figure 5A).
Effect of treatments on nitrate reduction The fixed amount of nitrate was added to all simulation containers, except for those labeled "unchanged", in the form of the product "Calcinit" (at a final concentration of 14 mM nitrate). In this fermentation study, the total methane produced was 7 to 8 ml in the absence of nitrate and was reduced to 1.5 ml when nitrate was supplied.
The concentration of nitrate and the products of its reduction, nitrite and ammonium, were analyzed after 2, 4 and 12 hours after inoculation. Although 14 mM nitrate was supplied in 0 hours, only approximately 10 mM nitrate concentration was found in the filtrate in all containers in 2 hours. In addition, the nitrate measured in solution was equal or marginally higher 2 hours later. This suggests that nitrate is quickly absorbed by the solid matrix or absorbed by the microbiota. This split balance would remain until the consumption of nitrate by bacteria was at a good rate. In the present study, the final sampling indicated a collapse in the nitrate level between 4 and 12 hours (figure 6). The effect of the high dose of alteration of M. elsdenii suggested that the reduction of nitrate was significantly slowed by the high dose of desabacteria.
The nitrite analysis at 2 and 4 hours of time points was compatible with the nitrate data. Within 2 hours, the nitrite concentration was below 0.05 mM with all treatments suggesting that the rate of nitrate reduction was low (figure 7A). in 4 hours the nitrite level had started to rise but it was still below 0.2 mM. It is worth noting that although S.ruminantium seemed to increase depending on the dose of nitrite, the dose of M. elsdenii decreased depending on it (figure 7B). after 12 hours the effect of M. elsdenii was clearer since in its absence the nitrite concentration had increased to 8 mM and reduced the dose dependent when the bacteria was added. With the change of pure M. elsdenii the dose of 1000 ul was necessary to completely remove nitrite. However, when combined with lactate, the dose of 100 ul lowered the nitrite concentration to the detection limit (figure 7C). the effect of increasing S. ruminantium nitrite was no longer detected in 12 hours suggesting that its metabolic role in the rumen model microcosm was negligible.
Ammonium is the final nitrate / nitrite reduction product. However, it is not a product that could be expected to accumulate quantitatively in the microbial system because it is a form of nitrogen that is readily assimilated by microbes when no preferred organic nitrogen source is available. This transient ammonium role makes it impossible to make accurate stoichiometric equilibrium calculations. In addition, it was obvious that when 14 mM nitrate was added to the fermentation systems, the residual ammonium concentration 12 hours later increased from 10 to 18 mM. When M. elsdenii was also added to the fermentation medium, the ammonium level reached 23 to 31 mM in concentration depending on the dose of additional lactate substrate provided (figure 8C). These data show indisputably that the change in nitrate leads to high production or accumulation of ammonium. the data also strongly suggest that M. elsdenii further reinforces this metabolic process. Residual ammonium concentration peaked at a dose of 100 μl of M. elsdenii, and at a dose of 1000 μl it showed a clear decline. Conclusions
The data presented here again confirmed that nitrate in the diet reduces methane production. They also showed that nitrate becomes reduced to nitrite and additionally to ammonium. This process appeared to be directly linked to the production of methane since the conditions that prevented quantitative reduction of nitrate also reduced the degree of inhibition of methanogenesis.
The alteration of M. elsdenii did not accelerate the reduction of nitrate but, in reality, it seemed to inhibit it. On the contrary, the dose of bacteria dependently reduced the residual concentration of nitrite and, concomitantly, increased the concentration of its reducing product, ammonium. These data suggest that this strain does not express functional nitrate reductase, but whenever any other bacteria catalyzes the reduction of nitrate into nitrite, the M. elsdenii strain readily reduces additionally in ammonium. This characteristic makes M. elsdenii an ideal means of preventing nitrite poisoning resulting from rapid production and accumulation of nitrite by nitrate-reducing bacteria.
According to the applicants' prior knowledge, M. elsdenii is not a primary means of using lactate in dairy cows. However, in beef cattle being fed high-grain diets, conditions for M. elsdenii are favorable. The reason is that this means of using lactate is highly competitive only when the level of lactic acid in the rumen is high. This characteristic of the bacterium is the reason why the applicants have also tested here the effect of lactic acid and the combination of M. elsdenii - lactic acid. The effects of M. elsdenii on several parameters went in the same direction whether lactic acid was included or not, but when lactic acid was provided the effects were stronger. This suggests that the competitiveness of M. elsdenii was improved by lactate. Why does the high dose of M. elsdenii inhibit nitrate reduction This can only be speculated here and the final answer could only come from a specifically designed study. One possible explanation is that M. elsdenii competes for some vital nutrients or cofactors with a major nitrate-reducing bacteria. Since the growth of M. elsdenii does not depend on reduction of nitrite and surpasses the nitrate reducer. Another possible explanation is an inhibition of the final product. The high dose of M. elsdenii leads to an increase in ammonium concentration, which can serve as a feedback inhibitor for nitrate reduction. References
Alaboudi, A. R. and G. A. Jones. 1985. Effect of Acclimation to High Nitrate Intakes on Some Rumen Fermentation Parameters in Sheep. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 65: 841-849.
Asanuma, N., M. Iwamoto, and T. Hino. 1999. Effect of the Addition of Fumarate on Methane Production by Ruminal Microorganisms In Vitro. J. Dairy Sci. 82 (4): 780-87.
Beauchemin, K. A., M. Kreuzer, F. Oâ € ™ Mara, and T. A. McAllister. 2008. Nutritional management for enteric methane abatement: a review. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48 (2): 21-27.
Bruning-Fann, C. S. and J. B. Kaneene. 1993. The effects of nitrate, nitrite, and N-nitrous compounds on animal health. Vet Hum Toxicol 35 (3): 237-253.
Evelyn, K. A. and H. T. Malloy. 1938. MICRO-DETERMINATION OF OXYHEMOGLOBIN, METHEMOGLOBIN, AND SULFHEMOGLOBIN IN A SINGLE SAMPLE OF BLOOD journal of biological chemistry 126: 655663. Guo, W. S., D. M. Schafer, X. X. Guo, L. P. Ren, and Q. X. Meng. 2009. Use of nitrate-nitrogen as a sole diet source nitrogen to inhibit ruminal methanogenesis and to improve microbial nitrogen synthesis in vitro. Asian- Australian Journal of Animal Science 22 (4): 542-549. Iwamoto, M., Asanuma N., and Hino, T. 1999 Effects of nitrate combined with fumarate on methanogenesis, fermentation, and cellulose digestion by mixed ruminal microbes in vitro. Animal Science Journal 70 (6): 471-478.
Iwamoto, M., Asanuma N., and Hino, T. 2001. Effects of pH and electron donors on nitrate and nitrite reduction in ruminal microbiotics. Animal Science Journal 72 (2): 117125.
Joblin, K. N. 1999. Ruminal acetogens and their potential to lower ruminant methane emissions. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 50 (8): 1307-1314.
Johnson, K. A. and D. E. Johnson. 1995. Methane emissions from cattle. J Anim Sci 73 (8): 2483-2492.
Le Van, T. D., J. A. Robinson, J. Ralph, R. C. Greening, W. J. Smolensk !, J. A. Z. Leedle, and D. M. Schaefer. 1998. Assessment of Reductive Acetogenesis with
Indigenous Ruminal Bacterium Populations and Acetitomaculum ruminis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64 (9): 3429-3436.
Lewis, D. 1951. The metabolism of nitrate and nitrite in the sheep; the reduction of nitrate in the rumen of the sheep. Biochem. J. 48 (2): 175-170.
Marais, J. P., J. J. Therion, R. I. Mackie, A. Kistner, and C. Dennison. 1988. Effect of nitrate and its reduction products on the growth and activity of the microbial rumen population. British Journal of Nutrition 59 (02): 301-313.
Molano, G., T. W. Knight, and H. Clark. 2008. Fumaric acid supplements have no effect on methane emissions per unit of food intake in wether lambs. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48 (2): 165168.
Sar, C, B. Mwenya, B. Santoso, K. Takaura, R. Morikawa, N. Isogai, Y. Asakura, Y. Toride, and J. Takahashi. 2005. Effect of Escherichia coli wild type or its derivative with high nitrite reductase activity on in vitro ruminal methanogenesis and nitrate / nitrite reduction. J. Anim Sci. 83 (3): 644-652.
Sar, C, B. Santoso, B. Mwenya, Y. Gamo, T. Kobayashi, R. Morikawa, K. Kimura, H. Mizukoshi, and J. Takahashi. 2004. Manipulation of rumen methanogenesis by the combination of nitrate with [beta] 1-4 galactooligosaccharides or nisin in sheep. Animal Feed Science and Technology 115 (1-2): 129-142.
Steinfeld, H., P. Gerber, T. Wassenaar, V. Castel, M. Rosales, and C. De Haan. 2006. Livestock's Long Shadow. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Takahashi, J., M. Ikeda, S. Matsuoka, and H. Fujita. 1998. Prophylactic effect of L-cysteine to acute and subclinical nitrate toxicity in sheep. Animal Feed Science and Technology 74 (3): 273-280.
Takahashi, J., and Young, B.A. 1991. Prophylactic effect of L-cysteine on nitrate-induced alterations in respiratory exchange and metabolic rate in sheep. Animal Feed Science and Technology 35: 105-113.
Takahashi, J., N. Johchi, and H. Fujita. 1989. Inhibitory effects of sulfur compounds, copper and tungsten on nitrate reduction by mixed rumen microorganisms. British Journal of Nutrition 61 (03): 741-748.
Ungerfeld, E. M., R. A. Kohn, R. J. Wallace, and C. J. Newbold. 2007. A meta-analysis of fumarate effects on methane production in ruminal batch cultures. J. Anim Sci. 85 (10): 2556-2563.
Verstegen, M. W. A., W. Van der Hel, H. A. Brandsma, A. M. Henken, and A. M. Bransen. 1987. The Wageningen respiration unit for animal production research: A description of the equipment and its possibilities. Energy Metabolism in Farm Animals:
Effects of Housing, Stress and Disease. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

权利要求:
Claims (5)
[0001]
1. Use of a combination of a nitrate compound and a sulfate compound characterized by being in the manufacture of a product for the non-therapeutic reduction of gastrointestinal production of methane in a ruminant, in which the total amount of the combination of nitrate and sulfate is greater than 10 g / kg and less than 750 g / kg, where the amount of nitrite-reducing probiotic microorganism is from 1 X 108 to 1 X 1014 cfu / kg / day, preferably from 1 X 109 to 1 X 1013 cfu / kg / day and more preferably from 1 X 1010 to 1 X 1012 cfu / kg / day.
[0002]
2. Compound feed characterized by comprising a combination of a nitrate compound and a sulfate compound, said combination providing a total amount of nitrate and sulfate greater than 10 g / kg and less than 750 g / kg, in which the amount of sulfate exceeds 7.5 g / kg on a dry weight basis, where the compound feed reduces the gastrointestinal production of methane in a ruminant.
[0003]
3. Compound feed, according to claim 2, characterized by the fact that the amount of nitrate exceeds 7.5 g / kg on a dry weight basis.
[0004]
4. Compound feed according to claim 2, characterized in that it additionally comprises a nitrite-reducing probiotic microorganism selected from Megasphaera elsdenii and Propionibacterium acidipropionici.
[0005]
5. Feed supplement characterized by comprising 10 to 100% of a combination of a nitrate compound and a sulfate compound, in which the amount of sulfate in the feed supplement, on a dry weight basis, exceeds 25 g / kg and does not exceed 250 g / kg; wherein the total amount of nitrate and sulphate combined is less than 250 g / kg; and in which the supplement is in the form selected from a powder, a compacted solid and a granulated solid.

类似技术:

---

公开号 | 公开日 | 专利标题

---

BR112012001524B1|2021-02-23|use of a combination of a nitrate compound and a sulfate compound, compound feed and feed supplement

---

US20160199390A1|2016-07-14|Animal feed including cationic cholesterol additive and related methods

---

Sar et al.2004|Manipulation of rumen methanogenesis by the combination of nitrate with β1-4 galacto-oligosaccharides or nisin in sheep

---

BR112012014004B1|2018-11-13|use of at least one alkanoic acid nitroxy, and / or its derivative and feed composition or feed additive comprising them, as well as a method for reducing methane production emanating from the digestive activities of a ruminant animal and / or improving performance of ruminant animals

---

KR20090074764A|2009-07-07|Use of particular antibacterial compounds, which are derived from alliaceae, as natural additives in animal feed

---

US20060029646A1|2006-02-09|Anionic-containing feed supplements having a low protein by-pass value

---

EP1986508B1|2014-05-21|Methods and compositions for treating feline hyperthyroidism

---

Patra2015|Urea/ammonia metabolism in the rumen and toxicity in ruminants

---

US10494683B2|2019-12-03|Nitrate- and nitrite-reducing probiotic feed additive

---

Klevenhusen et al.2009|Efficiency of monolaurin in mitigating ruminal methanogenesis and modifying C-isotope fractionation when incubating diets composed of either C3 or C4 plants in a rumen simulation technique | system

---

WO2001028551A9|2002-07-04|Agents for promoting fattening of animals and method of promoting fattening

---

CA2845687C|2019-06-18|Ferulic acid as feed supplement in beef cattle to promote animal growth and improve the meat quality of the carcass and the meat

---

WO2020074672A2|2020-04-16|Antibiotic-free antimicrobial feed additives and antimicrobial compositions

---

KR100459918B1|2004-12-03|A livestock feed additive comprising δ-aminolevulinic acid for enhancing viability of livestock

---

Weinberg2003|Effect of lactic acid bacteria on animal performance

---

de Aguiar Veloso2020|Effects of ruminally-protected lysine supplementation on growing and finishing performance of beef cattle

---

MARIN et al.2020|Researches concerning the use of feed ingredients to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in dairy cows farms.

---

CN111109468A|2020-05-08|Compound feed for poultry and preparation method thereof

---

Ravindra et al.2004|Manipulation of rumen methanogenesis by the combination of nitrate with β1-4 galacto-oligosaccharides or nisin i...

---

WO2020082109A1|2020-04-30|Compositions for administration to ruminant animals

---

Lebzien et al.2009|Effects of a niacin supplementation to different diets on rumen fermentation, amounts of niacin at the duodenum and its concentration in blood and milk of dairy cows

同族专利:

---

公开号 | 公开日

---

RU2012106652A|2013-08-27|

---

PT2456323T|2017-07-26|

---

CA2768565A1|2011-01-27|

---

WO2011010921A2|2011-01-27|

---

ES2633690T3|2017-09-22|

---

KR20120099370A|2012-09-10|

---

DK2456323T3|2017-08-14|

---

ZA201200508B|2013-06-26|

---

EP2456323A2|2012-05-30|

---

AR077424A1|2011-08-24|

---

CN102497786A|2012-06-13|

---

CL2012000184A1|2012-07-20|

---

CA2768565C|2017-12-12|

---

MX2012001014A|2012-06-08|

---

KR101808353B1|2017-12-12|

---

AU2010275083B2|2015-07-23|

---

US20120219527A1|2012-08-30|

---

AP2012006115A0|2012-02-29|

---

UY32802A|2011-01-31|

---

JP2012533320A|2012-12-27|

---

AU2010275083A1|2012-03-01|

---

HUE034179T2|2018-01-29|

---

EP2456323B1|2017-06-07|

---

BR112012001524A2|2018-03-27|

---

PL2456323T3|2017-10-31|

---

WO2011010921A3|2011-04-21|

---

AU2010275083A2|2012-03-22|

---

MX341151B|2016-08-09|

---

US8771723B2|2014-07-08|

---

AU2010275083A8|2012-03-22|

引用文献:

---

公开号 | 申请日 | 公开日 | 申请人 | 专利标题

---

---

GB1005166A|1962-09-04|1965-09-22|Basf Ag|Production of granulated ammonium sulphate nitrate|

---

US3753723A|1970-07-31|1973-08-21|H Henderson|Animal feed and method of making same|

---

US3873728A|1972-04-18|1975-03-25|Allied Chem|Method of feeding ruminants a high-energy feedstuff admixed with a NPN supplement|

---

US6120810A|1992-03-30|2000-09-19|Oklahoma State University|Bacterial composition to reduce the toxic effects of high nitrate consumption in livestock|

---

CA2147647C|1992-10-22|1999-06-01|James Martin Odom|Anthraquinone inhibition of methane production in methanogenic bacteria|

---

JP3232193B2|1994-06-02|2001-11-26|潤一 高橋|Ruminant feeding composition and method for improving ruminant feed efficiency|

---

HU9904669A3|1996-07-08|2001-06-28|Univ Columbia|Therapeutic applications of t-bamtechnology to treat diseases involving smooth muscle cells|

---

AU3464400A|1999-03-17|2000-10-04|Cooperatieve Verkoop- En Productievereniging Van Aardappelmeel En Derivaten Avebe B.A.|Foodstuff containing discrete starch particles|

---

NZ537242A|2002-06-21|2008-10-31|Newcastle Innovation Ltd|Probiotic propionibacterium jensenii 702|

---

JP2006063002A|2004-08-25|2006-03-09|Ajinomoto Co Inc|Methanation inhibitor and composition for feed for ruminant|

---

UY32802A|2009-07-23|2011-01-31|Provimi Holding B V|COMPOSITIONS TO REDUCE GASTROINTESTINAL METANOGENESIS IN RUMINANTS|UY32802A|2009-07-23|2011-01-31|Provimi Holding B V|COMPOSITIONS TO REDUCE GASTROINTESTINAL METANOGENESIS IN RUMINANTS|

---

KR101927553B1|2010-12-20|2018-12-10|디에스엠 아이피 어셋츠 비.브이.|Use of nitrooxy organic molecules in feed for reducing methane emission in ruminants, and/or to improve ruminant performance|

---

BRPI1102284A2|2011-05-23|2013-11-05|Grasp Ind E Com Ltda|ADDITIVE FOR ANIMAL NUTRITION BASED ON NITRATES AND SULFATES ENCAPSULATED TO REDUCE METHANE EMISSION FROM RUMINAL FERMENTATION|

---

ES2547106T3|2011-05-26|2015-10-01|Dsm Ip Assets B.V.|Use of a feed composition to reduce the emission of methane in ruminants, and / or to improve the performance of ruminants|

---

KR101336980B1|2011-11-08|2013-12-05|두산생물자원주식회사|Microorganism capable of reducing methane produced by ruminant animals and its uses|

---

US9289418B2|2013-03-15|2016-03-22|Cedars-Sinai Medical Center|Methods of diagnosis, selection, and treatment of diseases and conditions caused by or associated with methanogens|

---

WO2014152754A2|2013-03-15|2014-09-25|Cedars-Sinai Medical Center|Methods of diagnosis, selection, and treatment of diseases and conditions caused by or associated with methanogens|

---

BR112016002559A2|2013-08-07|2017-08-01|Dsm Ip Assets Bv|use of feed composition to reduce methane emission in ruminants and / or to improve ruminant performance.|

---

CN103518965B|2013-10-11|2015-04-01|中国农业科学院饲料研究所|Premix feed capable of reducing methane emission of cattle and sheep|

---

KR101641755B1|2013-12-09|2016-07-21|순천대학교 산학협력단|Microorganism for ruminal methane mitigation and ruminal enhancing feed efficiency of ruminant|

---

CN104000052A|2014-05-14|2014-08-27|四川农业大学|Ruminant methane emission reduction lapping brick|

---

KR101656929B1|2014-06-02|2016-09-13|씨제이제일제당 |Feed additive composition for reducing methane gas produced by ruminant animals|

---

CA2955666A1|2014-08-13|2016-02-18|Cedars-Sinai Medical Center|Anti-methanogenic compositions and uses thereof|

---

KR101834227B1|2014-10-23|2018-03-05|전북대학교산학협력단|Feed Ingredients Against Methane Gas Produced by the Rumen of Ruminant Animals|

---

KR101611212B1|2014-11-19|2016-04-12|한국생명공학연구원|Microorganism Inhibiting Methane Producing Microorganism and Use therof|

---

US10736871B2|2015-04-01|2020-08-11|Cedars-Sinai Medical Center|Anti-methanogenic lovastatin analogs or derivatives and uses thereof|

---

US20180125095A1|2015-05-06|2018-05-10|Yara International Asa|The use of nitrate for improving the reproductive performance of monogastric mammals|

---

WO2017187433A1|2016-04-26|2017-11-02|The State Of Israel, Ministry Of Agriculture & Rural Development, Agricultural Research Organization|Regulation of feed efficiency and methane production in ruminating animals|

---

KR101911465B1|2016-11-25|2018-10-24|전북대학교 산학협력단|Nitrate coating composition for reducing the methane gas produced by the rumen of ruminant Animals and method for producing the same|

---

CN107788236A|2017-11-08|2018-03-13|中国科学院亚热带农业生态研究所|A kind of method for improving straw feeding value and reducing ruminant domestic animal discharge of methane|

法律状态:
2018-05-02| B06F| Objections, documents and/or translations needed after an examination request according [chapter 6.6 patent gazette]|

---

2018-08-21| B06T| Formal requirements before examination [chapter 6.20 patent gazette]|

---

2019-02-05| B07A| Technical examination (opinion): publication of technical examination (opinion) [chapter 7.1 patent gazette]|

---

2019-02-05| B15K| Others concerning applications: alteration of classification|Free format text: AS CLASSIFICACOES ANTERIORES ERAM: A23K 1/18 , A23K 1/175 , A23K 1/00 Ipc: A23K 50/10 (2016.01) |

---

2019-05-21| B09B| Patent application refused [chapter 9.2 patent gazette]|

---

2019-07-30| B12B| Appeal: appeal against refusal|

---

2021-02-23| B16A| Patent or certificate of addition of invention granted|Free format text: PRAZO DE VALIDADE: 10 (DEZ) ANOS CONTADOS A PARTIR DE 23/02/2021, OBSERVADAS AS CONDICOES LEGAIS. |

优先权:

---

申请号 | 申请日 | 专利标题

---

EP09166276|2009-07-23|

---

EP09166276.7|2009-07-23|

---

PCT/NL2010/050473|WO2011010921A2|2009-07-23|2010-07-23|Compositions for reducing gastro-intestinal methanogenesis in ruminants|

---